CrackML by @ml.with.umang
Interview questions / GenAI & LLM
GenAI & LLM interview question

How does an LSTM differ from a Transformer?

How does an LSTM differ from a Transformer?. Structure your response as you would in a top-tier ML/AI engineering interview.

mediumconceptEvidence 75/1001 source reportAmazon

The 60-second answer

A Transformer stacks attention, feed-forward layers, residual connections, and normalization around token representations. Position information is injected explicitly because attention alone is permutation-invariant.

Build the answer in this order

1
Define the mechanism

A Transformer stacks attention, feed-forward layers, residual connections, and normalization around token representations.

2
Explain the architecture

Position information is injected explicitly because attention alone is permutation-invariant.

3
Compare trade-offs

Training objective and masking depend on architecture: encoder, decoder, or encoder–decoder.

4
Close with serving + evaluation

Discuss sequence-length cost, batching, mixed precision, and serving optimizations when moving from architecture to production.

A useful interview mental model

This is the shape of a strong answer—not a script to memorize.

01Definition
02Mechanism
03Trade-offs
04Failure modes
05When to use

Senior-level signal

  • Discuss memory bandwidth and attention/KV-cache costs, not only FLOPs, when reasoning about real latency.
  • Tie architectural choices to the task, context length, training objective, and deployment constraints.

What the interviewer is really testing

Understanding beyond prompting: architecture, retrieval, evaluation, inference, safety, latency, cost, and failure recovery.

Likely follow-up questions

What assumption makes this approach work?
When would you choose the strongest alternative instead?
What production or data failure mode changes your answer?

Common weak-answer patterns

  • Reciting a definition without mechanism or assumptions.
  • Claiming one technique is always better without a data regime.
  • Stopping before failure modes, validation, or deployment implications.